ACG Research

ACG Research
We focus on the Why before the What
Showing posts with label T-Mobile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label T-Mobile. Show all posts

Monday, December 19, 2011

Value-Add or Value-Absent, What’s Your Network?

As we wind down the year, and get ready to kick off 2102, now is a good time to set up some thoughts for 2012. My predictions will be published by Fierce Telecom in January, but let me discuss one theme that will be the basis of my research in 2012: For the mobile operators, the network is still one of the best differentiators.

Verizon has long positioned its network as the “largest, most reliable network” and with its launch of LTE has amended that statement to be the “fastest, most reliable 4G network” (despite outages in April and December in the LTE network). Both messages underpin my key point: if you don’t have network coverage where you are, it doesn’t matter what your device, apps or services are. But the value-add aspect doesn’t stop simply with ample coverage and performance. Each operator has its own spin on its value proposition to consumers.

Sprint leverages its unique unlimited smartphone data plans, new iPhone franchise, as well as its industry leading customer purchasing experience satisfaction scores to offset an aging WiMAX 4G network with limited coverage area.

T-Mobile it taking the largest 4G network and pairing it with low-cost plans and a killer range of devices. T-Mobile is looking to simplify the complexity of the smartphones with its myTouch phones even as it pushes the top end with the Samsung Galaxy S II and its huge screen, fast processor and HSPA+42 network.

AT&T comes in a little late to the LTE party, but early indications are that it is very quickly taking over the “fastest 4G” mantel even at it touts the speed advantage of its 3G network for its iPhone users. Speed, coverage and the next-generation network is right around the corner, not to mention a triple-play option for its customers.

Not surprisingly, not everyone agrees with the idea that networks need to get smarter. Satellite-LTE carrier LightSquared will be "the dumbest broadband wireless pipe," CEO Sanjiv Ahuja told a conference, as reported in a Nov 2011 PC World article. "I want no intelligence in our network. None. Zero. We are an absolute utility.” (http://www.pcworld.com/article/243021/lightsquared_will_be_a_dumb_pipe_ceo_says.html).

As we focus on the connected lifestyle or the gigabit lifestyle the role of the operator and the network infrastructure remains a critical element. Mobile operators are not all the same. Differences resulting from spectrum positions, network design, device portfolio, pricing plans, backhaul, network architecture and even the organizational structure of the operator all come to play in affecting the user’s experience. The situation is dynamic, but when it comes down to making a purchase decision, most buyers are looking at the near term, not the end of their two-year contracts.

Chris Nicoll
cnicoll@acgresearch.net
www.acgresearch.net

Friday, December 2, 2011

The US Mobile Consumer Deserves a Reset

The AT&T and T-Mobile merger raises serious issues as to how the FCC is conducting its regulatory oversight responsibility. Clearly, it’s time for real reform.

Whether you are for or against the merger between AT&T and T-Mobile, you have to be very concerned at how the process is playing out (refer to Roger Entner’s well documented FierceWireless’ article (http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/where-due-process-fcc-releases-report-attt-mobile/2011-11-30).

It is convenient to lay the broken process at the feet of the current administration; however, this is not a new failing of just Obama's FCC. Dating back to 2006 Former Chairman Reed Hundt observed that the FCC has the “reputation for … capture by special interests, mind-boggling delay, internal strife, lack of competence, and a dreadful record on judicial review.” The low opinion of the FCC’s reform process continues today (fcc-reform.org): “Rather, because the agency operates with limited imagination, almost no strategic thinking or planning, and with an absence of well-developed sources of data to guide its decisions, it often misses opportunities to chart independent courses of action…to be sure, the agency also has an uncomfortable track record of conducting its proceedings…without engaging in careful data-driven decision-making… (http://fcc-reform.org/paper/fcc-reform-and-future-telecommunications-policy/i-background/fcc-historical-perspective). This unfortunately sounds all too familiar in the AT&T/T-Mobile’s application.

The FCC also broke with tradition and before having a full vote, had already signaled its intentions. Actually, the entire process has been broken, raising serious doubt as to how the FCC is conducting its regulatory oversight responsibility.

What this means is that a reset is needed and that is just what AT&T and T-Mobile have done by withdrawing their application. Their message: let’s start the process over and get it right this time. But there is a dilemma: How will it be possible to get an unbiased review, using the established criteria, in which that the market can be confident for this and future transactions?

Sticking with precedent would be a great start. Mobile competition has always been measured on a local level (for example, Denver is different from the competition in Washington, DC), and that should not change. Considering ALL of the competitive options is the next step. MetroPCS, Cricket, Leap, C-Spire and others deserve to be recognized for their important roles in the market, not cast aside. Let’s at least start there. After that, are we going to regulate users and/or spectrum holdings? That also needs to be addressed especially in light of the Verizon/CableCo spectrum deal (refer to Phil Goldstein’s article: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-buy-spectrumcos-aws-spectrum-36b/2011-12-02?utm_campaign=TwitterEditor-FierceWireless). They may look like separate transactions, but the impact on the user and the markets are definitely linked.

The US market is widely regarded as the most competitive 4G market in the world. As pointed out by the FCC, Americans enjoy unprecedented choice when it comes to their mobile services. While the US has the most mobile operator choice, other countries such as Sweden show faster service by using larger spectrum allocations. However, the FCC continues to be mute on how to solve the near-term problem at hand: spectrum availability. Their actions on AT&T/T-Mobile and VZW/CableCo will speak volumes. The mobile broadband market is too important to America’s growth, competitiveness and economy to be saddled with such an opaque and inconsistent regulatory oversight process as exhibited during the AT&T/T-Mobile review. It may turn out that this merger will not receive government approval, but let’s complete the entire process to determine the outcome. American mobile consumers deserve nothing less.

For more on T-Mobile read Chris' article When it comes to 4G, T-Mobile has the advantage on FierceWireless.

Chris Nicoll
cnicoll@acgresearch.net
www.acgresearch.net